CroJack
Key Player
All credit for these scatter graphics goes to @experimental361.
Expected goals for and against; expected points:
Shots for and against:
Shots taken per goal scored and shots taken per match:
Shots faced per goal conceded and shots faced per match:
Expected goals allowed per match and expected goals created per match:
1. Expected points
Bad news: we are far behind Leeds, Brentford and Sheffield Wednesday.
Good news: we have deserved to be in the mix for the play off places.
2. Shots for and against
Bad news: we concede too many shots per game, which is a structural problem. When I say structural problem then I mean Steve Cooper and our style of play. We are not defending as a team and we don't have a proper defensive structure.
Good news: we are in top five for shots taken per match.
3. Shots taken per goal scored and shots taken per match
Bad news: none.
Good news: optimists would say we are pretty clinical, and pesimists that we are slightly wasteful. We need 10 shots to score 1 goal.
4. Shots faced per goal conceded and shots faced per match
Bad news: none.
Good news: when we face shots we rarely concede. Opposition needs 15 shots to score 1 goal against us.
5. Expected goals allowed per match and expected goals created per match
Bad news: we allow 1.5 expected goal per game, which means we deserve to concede 1.5 goals per game. We create less, only 1.45 expected goals per game, which means that we, on average, deserve to score 1.45 goals per game. We allow opposition to create too many good chances against us.
Good news: none.
It's important to notice that the stats from our last game have not been calculated, which means that our numbers in the above scatter graphics are slightly worse than they should be. We created much better chances than Boro.
Expected goals for and against; expected points:
Shots for and against:
Shots taken per goal scored and shots taken per match:
Shots faced per goal conceded and shots faced per match:
Expected goals allowed per match and expected goals created per match:
1. Expected points
Bad news: we are far behind Leeds, Brentford and Sheffield Wednesday.
Good news: we have deserved to be in the mix for the play off places.
2. Shots for and against
Bad news: we concede too many shots per game, which is a structural problem. When I say structural problem then I mean Steve Cooper and our style of play. We are not defending as a team and we don't have a proper defensive structure.
Good news: we are in top five for shots taken per match.
3. Shots taken per goal scored and shots taken per match
Bad news: none.
Good news: optimists would say we are pretty clinical, and pesimists that we are slightly wasteful. We need 10 shots to score 1 goal.
4. Shots faced per goal conceded and shots faced per match
Bad news: none.
Good news: when we face shots we rarely concede. Opposition needs 15 shots to score 1 goal against us.
5. Expected goals allowed per match and expected goals created per match
Bad news: we allow 1.5 expected goal per game, which means we deserve to concede 1.5 goals per game. We create less, only 1.45 expected goals per game, which means that we, on average, deserve to score 1.45 goals per game. We allow opposition to create too many good chances against us.
Good news: none.
It's important to notice that the stats from our last game have not been calculated, which means that our numbers in the above scatter graphics are slightly worse than they should be. We created much better chances than Boro.
Last edited: