But is he any better on a dry pitch, CJ? Sorreeeeeeee, I couldn't resist it!
But is he any better on a dry pitch, CJ? Sorreeeeeeee, I couldn't resist it!
Yeah, looks like I was wrong. Most likely it will act as a 343 in attack which is interesting.I wonder if it's 3 at the back.
Depends what the wingbacks do. My guess is we'll see a 5-4-1or 5-3-2 in defence that will transition to a 3-4-3 when Potter wants us to attack.Looks to be quite an attacking side against the top scorers in the division. I like that.
Yeah that's what I expect to see. I hope sometimes we will see the wingbacks push up and Celina push into more attacking positions.
That's if we DO any attacking! We haven't done much in the last game and a half. Maybe they'll surprise us and I hope to God they do.Actually, I think we'll play 3-4-1-2 when attacking
I didn't say how nany times we'll attack them!!! One attacking action is still attacking .That's if we DO any attacking! We haven't done much in the last game and a half. Maybe they'll surprise us and I hope to God they do.
I don't like that. There are tactical reasons for using a 3/5 at the back systems that don't solely involve defending, but utilizing a defensive winger as opposed to Asoro or Montero seems a little...I don't know, cowardly?From WOL:
4-2-3-1?
At first glance, it looked like the Swans would go with a back five tonight.
But we’re hearing that they’ll stick with a 4-2-3-1 system tonight, with Connor Roberts pushing forward on the right while Kyle Naughton slots in at right-back.
Potter obviously think their left side with Douglas, Alioski and Saiz is more dangerous. But Pablo is their most creative player with 3 key passes per game.From WOL:
4-2-3-1?
At first glance, it looked like the Swans would go with a back five tonight.
But we’re hearing that they’ll stick with a 4-2-3-1 system tonight, with Connor Roberts pushing forward on the right while Kyle Naughton slots in at right-back.
Defensively? Agree....utilizing a defensive winger as opposed to Asoro or Montero seems a little...I don't know, cowardly?