Ownership Comminicates ...

ivoralljack

Grizzled Veteran
Staff member
Usual waffle with little of substance to hang your hat on. They say they've invested money but WHAT money? Sure, they purchased the previous owners shares (without involving the Trust) but that is NOT investment, certainly not in the club or players. In the meantime (give or take a bit) they sold Gylfi for £45ml Shelvey £12m; Fernandez £8m; Fabianski £7m; Oli £20m; Dan; £15m; Rodon £12m; Celina £5m.

I may have missed a couple but I calculate that player sales have brought in capital well in excess of £120 million. Okay, I realise there have been some player purchases and also wages and overheads etc to pay but nevertheless............ What I want to know is, apart from the purchase price of the shares, HOW MUCH OF THEIR OWN MONEY HAVE THE OWNERS INVESTED IN THE CLUB TO BUY PLAYERS ETC. Nothing so far as I know. Please correct me if I'm wrong. In fact, we have so little money we can't realistically pay a couple of million for a player and, by the way, meantime we can't even maintain Status One for our Academy, which surely has proved to be a brilliant return on investment producing the likes of Oli, Dan and Rodon who were sold for good money as well as other assets such as Connor Roberts.

No, so far as I'm concerned our owners are carpetbaggers intent only on asset stripping our club of all they can before they sell it and move on. If anyone has any evidence to the contrary, I'd be delighted to hear about it. But don't insult me with fine words that mean sod all. Heard it all before!
 

Yankee_Jack

Key Player
There was a Companies House filing a couple of months ago relating to financing - forget the amount - that I think went in part to the relaying of the pitch. I posted a link to the filing on the forum. I don't remember exactly where that came from but I think that was a convertible note by the new owner.
 

Jackflash

Midfield General
Staff member
Usual waffle with little of substance to hang your hat on. They say they've invested money but WHAT money? Sure, they purchased the previous owners shares (without involving the Trust) but that is NOT investment, certainly not in the club or players. In the meantime (give or take a bit) they sold Gylfi for £45ml Shelvey £12m; Fernandez £8m; Fabianski £7m; Oli £20m; Dan; £15m; Rodon £12m; Celina £5m.

I may have missed a couple but I calculate that player sales have brought in capital well in excess of £120 million. Okay, I realise there have been some player purchases and also wages and overheads etc to pay but nevertheless............ What I want to know is, apart from the purchase price of the shares, HOW MUCH OF THEIR OWN MONEY HAVE THE OWNERS INVESTED IN THE CLUB TO BUY PLAYERS ETC. Nothing so far as I know. Please correct me if I'm wrong. In fact, we have so little money we can't realistically pay a couple of million for a player and, by the way, meantime we can't even maintain Status One for our Academy, which surely has proved to be a brilliant return on investment producing the likes of Oli, Dan and Rodon who were sold for good money as well as other assets such as Connor Roberts.

No, so far as I'm concerned our owners are carpetbaggers intent only on asset stripping our club of all they can before they sell it and move on. If anyone has any evidence to the contrary, I'd be delighted to hear about it. But don't insult me with fine words that mean sod all. Heard it all before!
Agreed Ivor, Talk is cheap.
 

Victoria Swan

Key Player
I may have missed a couple but I calculate that player sales have brought in capital well in excess of £120 million.
See the thread "Profits for the Yanks" in the first team Swansea City thread from a few months back. Here's what it said:
"According to this recent analysis we have a net loss/gain of +£63,420,000 on transfers over the past decade. This places us only behind Brentford in the entire Championship for monies gained from transfers. See: Revealed: Luton Town, Blackburn Rovers and Swansea City's SHOCK net spend over 10 years"
 
Top Bottom