This article is crap. Have people gone over the line with the treatment of Routledge sure but overall his career at Swansea wasn't that good. He wasn't a part of bringing Swansea through the divisions, he was only a part of the Premier league era. The article itself states he's been bad the last 3 years. So then you look at the other 4 seasons I'd say he's had two good seasons and then two average seasons. (And I think that's being kind) Not exactly as the article states
"When the day comes to bid farewell, Swansea fans should recognise Routledge’s years of great service and celebrate his fantastic achievements rather than spitefully deride him."
His biggest achievement is he was selected for a lot of games and as many Swansea fans have pointed out that shouldn't have been the case. That's why so many are happy to see him go he won't be selected seemingly every week undeservedly.